Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Les Demoiselles d'Avignon

April 4th 2006 10:54
Why it’s important.

This painting arguably marks the beginning of Modern Art. It’s confronting, has an incredible amount of ideology in it and actually inspired heaps of art movements-cubism being the most famous. It’s controversial, often dubbed vulgar, and is set in a brothel-I mean what more could we ask?

What makes it good?

What Picasso basically does here is totally smash the conventions of the female nude. The women in his work aren’t ‘ideal’ their angular and are the opposite of anything remotely sensual.

He also destroys the concept of perspective and spatial depth-the women aren’t flat they’re shaded in a way that gives them a three dimensional quality but their by no means 'real' either.


At the same ground there’s no foreground or background. As in-there’s nothing that gives you any sense of space in painting. To add to all this, Picasso has set the painting in a brothel to makes sure he got under the skin of as many people as possible.


What’s so important about this work is that Picasso basically yells that hey, art may have rules but you don’t have to abide by them all the time. He’s giving artists permission to break the rules and experiment.

Perhaps the best way to sum up the painting is through Picasso’s own words: “Every act of creation is first an act of destruction.”

How to use this info at a cocktail party:

This is a great topic to bring up, because allot of people will consider this work as vulgar. Many still argue that its not art. So its definitely something to think about.





The info for this post was taken from the following sites: http://www.geocities.com/rr17bb/LesDemoi.html and the quote was from the site: http://www.brainyquote.com.
77
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Recent Posts:
      A CHORUS LINE 
      SPOKE 
      Deadly: in-between heaven and hell 
      Sundance Film Festival 
      The Magnets 
Comments
5 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Matt

April 4th 2006 11:56
hmm, interesting... Ive never been one to truly understand (and hence appreciate) art, particularly modern art. Sure, i know what i like, i know what i find appealing and what i dont... but thats such a purely asthetic point of view. Picasso is a perfect example of my lack of skill and understanding of modern art - i see what's being presented and introspectively i feel nothing, i look at the artwork above and feel neither distaste or appreciation. I guess thats why im here well thats my useless comment for the day, hooray!

swing by sydney diary sometime, i'd like to see what you think

Comment by Sara

April 4th 2006 12:29
That's the thing about modern art-its really hard to really appreciate it. I mean, the 'old school' art is amazing because theyre so much more accessible. I mean to an extent modern artists have forgotten the importance of beauty in art-i think Picasso is one of those people. His paintings are amazing because of the mind behind them not necessarily what's presented on the canvas. So yeah, i understand what you mean.

Comment by Cibbuano

April 4th 2006 13:20
Sara, this was a stimulating post. I never liked Picasso in primary school - he was too 'out there', and I used to giggle at the sketches he drew of sexual acts.

Since then, however, I've seen some of his pieces in museums and have been blown away by the lines, the colours, the bizarre interpretation of reality.


Comment by AdamB

April 5th 2006 09:18
Some paintings I can appreciate for aesthetics and some for ideas. Sometimes though I think people get a little too obsessed with one or the other.

The worst thing is when someone does a picture that is based entirely on an idea but it's an idea that has been done a million times. If the idea is the entire point of the work it at least has to be strong and original (or making a point by being unoriginal)

But then, who cares what I think

Adam

Comment by Sara

April 5th 2006 12:03
It is a fine line between being ideological and still creating something that's nice to look at. I think Picasso's good at doing that, i mean, as Cibbuano said, the colours and lines really blow you away. The best way to look at it is after seeing all these tradition works-i mean picture the mona lisa, thats the idea of perfection-all the rules are applied. Picasso shatters everyone of them. I understand what you mean though Adam.

Cibbuano, i used to do the same thing in primary school. hehe.

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
8 Posts
7 Posts
3 Posts
596 Posts dating from January 2001
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

David Jobling's Blogs

34870 Vote(s)
19 Comment(s)
620 Post(s)
51790 Vote(s)
353 Comment(s)
764 Post(s)
18413 Vote(s)
11 Comment(s)
286 Post(s)
60179 Vote(s)
31 Comment(s)
1053 Post(s)
Moderated by David Jobling
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]