Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | My Orble | Login
 
Adelaide Festival 2010Fringe 2010Fringe 2010

VSU

April 24th 2006 14:11
For anybody who doesn’t know VSU stands for Voluntary Student Unionism and it’s a new policy that has been subject to much debate recently. I figured it was important to write a bit about VSU and why its caused such controversy recently.

Reasons why VSU is a good thing.

1.None of us wants to spend $400 or more every year on student/uni fees.

2.People who support VSU claim that it’s a matter of choice and freedom. People should be able to choose where their money goes and on what they want to spend it.

3.The union claims that VSU will take away food subsidies ie discounts, but that’s not really a fair claim since our fees have paid for those discounts anyway.


4.Many claim they don’t want to support ‘radical’ student bodies that don’t represent their views.

Reasons why VSU is a bad thing:

1.The SRC and Union provide many services for disadvantaged students. This includes free legal advice, help with centerlink, counselling and the opportunity for political expression-these services would be under threat under VSU.

2.Student bodies are dominated by the left at the moment, yes-but that makes sense-the right currently controls the country and thus people with that way of thinking are being represented every day. Freedom of speech includes giving the people who disagree with you the right to speak. If politics dosen’t represent/interest you in anyway-it still has the potential to impact you in a very serious way in the future. The SRC gives you the opportunity to speak should this happen.

3.Sure, people should have the right to choose where their money goes. That is a perfectly honourable sentiment but it’s not practical. I may not agree with the Howard government and I may not believe that they represent me in any way. But does that mean I don’t have to pay my taxes? No matter how much I disagree with the government tax money still goes to building roads, maintaining hospitals etc. Things we all need or will potentially use. If we made taxes voluntary nothing would get done, and many of our services wouldn’t exist anymore. The people who would loose the most would be those who don’t have the means to find alternatives.


Guys I’m not trying to advocate a particular view in this context just to provide an overview of the different sides of debate. Tell me what you all think.
189
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   

   

   


Recent Posts:
      BEN HUR - The Stadium Spectacular 
      Wallace and Grommit 
      BiG NATE 
      RARE Bob Brozman National TOUR 
Comments
11 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Trina

April 24th 2006 14:38
Hmmm how will VSU affect the university clubs and societies? What about the use of facilties and rooms - will they start charging? And will they stop subsidising costs for holding events? I head a society so I'm just wondering how much will change from next semester onwards... apparently clubs will have to be pretty self-sufficient from next year onwards or they'll just die out. Others say it won't have much effect on societies so I'm pretty confused.

Comment by Stanley

April 24th 2006 23:23
I resent this government interfering with university policy, while increasingly cutting off funding and raising HECS.

VSU is just another one of those things as mentioned by Sara which provides for essential services for not only disadvantaged uni students, but ALL uni students, like health and legal services. Sure, a lot of money does get pissed away by student bodies but we’re being rorted throughout society anyway but no one is demanding that the culture of government be fundamentally changed. AWB, anyone?

Also, I don’t buy into the student politics is dominated by the left thing, because I feel that most students who are part of the student government are centre-left at best, and if they considered themselves Labor students they’d be from the right wing of the party.

Anyway, someone will probably attempt to punch holes into my argument but this is a democratic space so anyone is welcome to air their thoughts and opinions. That’s my 5 cents.

Comment by Sara

April 25th 2006 00:04
Your right stanley, its just that I used a very broad definition of the left in the post (any thats not part of the liberal party) and i generally think of labour as left (left-left or left-right is still left!) but i see your point. Maybe i should do a post on the political specturm...hmmm. Trina-i'll get back to you on your questions, i just want to make sure i give you the right answers.

Comment by Scott

April 25th 2006 04:33
I'm against VSU, and one of the main reasons is that the government wants to introduce it, not because they think it's morally right, but in order to cripple the Student Union, which is a thorn in its side.

Scott

Punk Blog

Comment by Glen

April 25th 2006 10:50
With VSU, you won't have a $400 reduction in upfront costs. Your Uni will charge you that anyway, take over the running of some things and give money to the union to run the things they don't care to have control over.

I've probably used a union service 3 times at most, but if I have to give an upfront fee I'd rather give it to someone representing the students.

Make It Reggae
Travel Australia

Comment by amy

April 26th 2006 14:39
Good pick for today's education!

But you shouldn't be afraid to state your own views, after you've edumacated us on the options. Nobody can pretend they're objective.

It's your site - get amongst it! =)

Comment by Sara

April 26th 2006 22:16
It's true Amy I can't pretend i'm objective. Still-i was wondering if any of you guys went to the rallies?

Comment by Stanley

April 28th 2006 01:13
Sara - i went to one last year and Liberal students came and protested against the people protesting and in support of the government! they did the same thing last year when uni lecturers went on strike over the new IR laws! Sheesh

Comment by Scott

April 29th 2006 05:21
Pro-government rallies? what is this world coming too??

Comment by Anonymou

June 8th 2006 05:46
I'm thinking maybe i made a mistake...i placed a placard up against the closed door of a church reading"v.s.u=very shit universities". And the other side read "dont let John Howard interfere with our medical community" In retrospect i am somewhat concerned that the latter message would have had more affinityto it and therefore one that would have been given more serious consideration by passers by.But what the hey,it was foul rainy weather...Thought anyone?

Comment by Socrates

April 12th 2007 03:20
There's a simple principle at stake here, which is whether or not students should be _forced_ to support each other financially. The analogy with state and federal taxation appears valid on the surface if you consider students as "citizens" of a university. Here's the rub - students _already_ pay fees to a university for the purpose of receiving an education, their primary purpose for being there. I spent five years at university and can quite happily say there is not one service provided by the student union that I couldn't have lived without. This is where the analogy with government taxation falls down - we cannot exist without many of the services provided by the government, where as a student I can go to uni and get my degree without using any of the services provided by the student union. Therefore compulsory membership of the union is a violation of fundamental democratic principles, including the right of _choice_ of association.

More Posts
13 Posts
22 Posts
11 Posts
118 Posts dating from January 2001
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0
Moderated by David Jobling
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]